Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available October 1, 2026
-
Why parasites occur in certain hosts in certain locations has been a long-standing question among ecological and evolutionary parasitologists. Encounter and compatibility filters summarize the likelihood that a host and parasite will physically interact and establish an infection upon contact. Encounter and compatibility filters are not fixed and, among multiple locations, the abiotic environmental characteristics and biotic community composition that contribute to the filters often vary spatially and temporally. Abiotic variation may directly affect hosts or parasites —particularly parasites with one or more free-living stages— whereas the local biotic community may dilute or amplify parasite transmission. Unlike directly transmitted parasites, complex-life cycle parasites use multiple hosts, thus having life cycles that, we hypothesize, are highly susceptible to the effects of spatiotemporal environmental variation. We modeled infection probability relationships of endohelminths from post-metamorphic wood frogs (Rana [Lithobates] sylvatica) and northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) with wetland characteristics, landscape composition, and the anuran species within the local community. Parasites included complex-life cycle trematodes that use amphibians as definitive hosts (Haematoloechus spp., Glypthelmins quieta) or as intermediate hosts (Alaria sp., Neodiplostomum sp., echinostomatids, Lechriorchis) and nematodes with direct or indirect life cycles (Cosmocercoides, Oswaldocruzia). Although our results demonstrate that distributions of parasites with complex and direct life cycles are correlated with some abiotic and biotic characteristics of the environment, there were few general trends. Each parasite's distribution had its own unique relationship with wetland, landscape, and amphibian-community variables and there was overall low predictability for most species. One landscape feature — the number of wetlands within the vicinity of the site of amphibian capture — was commonly included in top models for leopard frogs and could be associated with how definitive hosts (e.g., amphibians, mammals, birds) and intermediate hosts (e.g., snails, odonates) use the landscape. The amphibian community at any given site also commonly affected infection probabilities, such that the local presence of other species tended to reduce infection probabilities in sampled frogs, lending support to the dilution effect at the landscape level. Our research highlights the need to consider spatiotemporal sampling, environmental variation, and host-community variation when studying parasite prevalence in any given component community.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available May 23, 2026
-
Schistosomatidae Stiles and Hassall 1898 is a medically significant family of digenetic trematodes (Trematoda: Digenea), members of which infect mammals or birds as definitive hosts and aquatic or amphibious gastropods as intermediate hosts. Currently, there are 17 named genera, for many of which evolutionary interrelationships remain unresolved. The lack of a resolved phylogeny has encumbered our understanding of schistosomatid evolution, specifically patterns of host-use and the role of host-switching in diversification. Here, we used targeted sequence capture of ultra-conserved elements (UCEs) from representatives of 13 of the 17 named genera and 11 undescribed lineages that are presumed to represent either novel genera or species to generate a phylogenomic dataset for the estimation of schistosomatid interrelationships. This study represents the largest phylogenetic effort within the Schistosomatidae in both the number of loci and breadth of taxon sampling. We present a near-comprehensive family-level phylogeny providing resolution to several clades of long-standing uncertainty within Schistosomatidae, including resolution for the placement of the North American mammalian schistosomes, implying a second separate capture of mammalian hosts. Additionally, we present evidence for the placement of Macrobilharzia at the base of the Schistosoma + Bivitellobilharzia radiation. Patterns of definitive and intermediate host use and a strong role for intermediate host-switching are discussed relative to schistosomatid diversification.more » « less
-
Abstract Fibricola and Neodiplostomum are diplostomid genera with very similar morphology that are currently separated based on their definitive hosts. Fibricola spp. are normally found in mammals, while Neodiplostomum spp. typically parasitize birds. Previously, no DNA sequence data was available for any member of Fibricola . We generated nuclear ribosomal and mtDNA sequences of Fibricola cratera (type-species), Fibricola lucidum and 6 species of Neodiplostomum . DNA sequences were used to examine phylogenetic interrelationships among Fibricola and Neodiplostomum and re-evaluate their systematics. Molecular phylogenies and morphological study suggest that Fibricola should be considered a junior synonym of Neodiplostomum . Therefore, we synonymize the two genera and transfer all members of Fibricola into Neodiplostomum . Specimens morphologically identified as Neodiplostomum cratera belonged to 3 distinct phylogenetic clades based on mitochondrial data. One of those clades also included sequences of specimens identified morphologically as Neodiplostomum lucidum . Further study is necessary to resolve the situation regarding the morphology of N. cratera . Our results demonstrated that some DNA sequences of N. americanum available in GenBank originate from misidentified Neodiplostomum banghami . Molecular phylogentic data revealed at least 2 independent host-switching events between avian and mammalian hosts in the evolutionary history of Neodiplostomum ; however, the directionality of these host-switching events remains unclear.more » « less
-
Abstract Classical theory suggests that parasites will exhibit higher fitness in sympatric relative to allopatric host populations (local adaptation). However, evidence for local adaptation in natural host–parasite systems is often equivocal, emphasizing the need for infection experiments conducted over realistic geographic scales and comparisons among species with varied life history traits. Here, we used infection experiments to test how two trematode (flatworm) species (Paralechriorchis syntomenteraandRibeiroia ondatrae) with differing dispersal abilities varied in the strength of local adaptation to their amphibian hosts. Both parasites have complex life cycles involving sequential transmission among aquatic snails, larval amphibians and vertebrate definitive hosts that control dispersal across the landscape. By experimentally pairing 26 host‐by‐parasite population infection combinations from across the western USA with analyses of host and parasite spatial genetic structure, we found that increasing geographic distance—and corresponding increases in host population genetic distance—reduced infection success forP. syntomentera, which is dispersed by snake definitive hosts. For the avian‐dispersedR. ondatrae, in contrast, the geographic distance between the parasite and host populations had no influence on infection success. Differences in local adaptation corresponded to parasite genetic structure; although populations ofP. syntomenteraexhibited ~10% mtDNA sequence divergence, those ofR. ondatraewere nearly identical (<0.5%), even across a 900 km range. Taken together, these results offer empirical evidence that high levels of dispersal can limit opportunities for parasites to adapt to local host populations.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
